Analise de Francisco Moita Flores
SIC (Querida Julia) - 29.08.2012
Traduit par Joana
Morais
Julia
Pinheiro : So, the British police admits to abandon the investigation
relative to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. [ref. English
police willing to abandon Madeleine McCann investigation] The Met
Commissioner [Bernard Hogan-Howe], responsible for the process,
stated to an English newspaper that until the end of the current year
the (English) government should decide if the investigation should
continue or not. It is a curious issue. I have with me, here,
Francisco Moita Flores and Paulo Sargento. Hello, good afternoon. How
are you both? What do you think Francisco?
Francisco
Moita Flores (prof. universitaire, criminologue): Good afternoon. This is very strange.
JP :
Very strange, isn't it?
FMF :
In fact, I think this is too strange, you see, in England, everyday,
children go missing. I wouldn't go as far as to say everyday, but at
least many times per month, children go missing...
JP : At least every week children go missing.
FMF : ...Like in Portugal, where some also disappear, and as we know there
aren't as many as those who go missing in England. This
investigation, is an investigation made to a process that was already
investigated. What the Scotland Yard is doing, and what the English
police is doing, is an investigation to the investigation that was
done by the Portuguese Judiciary Police.
JP : Yes, and in that they have already spent close to 3 million pounds.
FMF : It was not the police that invested in there [in the review].
JP : Who was it then?
FMF : Those who invested are always the same.
JP : Right.
FMF : That is, it's the government that handles the money, so they can find
every possible solution that exists for the Maddie case. Even though
the solution, for them, is always one and the same: "The child
was abducted", and thus "Let us see where did the Judiciary
Police failed", so "We can can find the abductor".
They don't consider alternative hypotheses. Therefore, what is taking
place, and I understood that from the first public appearance of the
English inspectors [ref.DCI Andy Redwood], is that there is a sort of
exam, an oral and written examination to the process investigated by
the Portuguese Judiciary Police. What is also true is that everything
that they have "found" at the time, the numerous leads
[ref. 195 "leads"], clues and similar, were all leads that
had been previously investigated [or dismissed] by the Portuguese
Police, leads that had already been cleared up.
JP : Without results.
FMF : What I fear, or rather what I would be afraid of, if the Portuguese
authorities turn a blind eye, is that a new whitewashing operation is
being prepared in this case. And the whitewashing operation results
in something similar to this: "the child was abducted",
"there aren't any other hypotheses", the issue of involving
people connected to the child is "vile", they are all "good
people", "it had to be a Moroccan or a Portuguese" -
it has to be someone whose complexion is a bit darker than average,
that has performed the abduction. "Those poor people were just
on holidays", "good people" and so on. To disturb them
or even question them is indeed an "insult". Well, that is
perverse, because it reveals that millions are being spent in order
to whitewash people's images [reputations].
JP : But doesn't the idea of closing the investigation come as an attempt
to put an end to the case, even the English people are tired...
FMF : The process is archived, the only one who can reopen the process is
the Portuguese General Attorney's Office. Everything that they are
doing is an investigation to a process that is archived!
JP : Exactly, so they are spending several resources of the British
government, in...
FMF : They are lucky not have the IMF in there.
JP : At least not yet. [laughs/ref. See Portugal and the IMF] Let me speak
with Paulo Sargento, who has been following the case attentively
since the beginning. What do you think?
Paulo
Sargento (prof. univers. psychologue forensique) : This has an hidden agenda behind it, as usual. When news,
precisely like this one, appear in the British media they have an
hidden agenda. About a month ago there was a first call to arms,
now...
JP : But what this man stated now was "let's close this", "it
will not really come to anything".
PS :
What that man stated is nonsense. It means nothing. They're going to
close, they're not going to close. First of all, they don't have any
sovereignty to...
JP : To close anything.
PS : Precisely. As Francisco said and very well. I fully endorse what
Francisco said, they don't have any sovereignty. [ref. Maddie Case
review is “A mendacity for the sake of the English”] Secondly,
what they did was a review of what the Judiciary Police had done. So,
nothing that they have done so far matters at all. What matters is
what we are going to have in September, on the 13th and 14th and then
on the 20th and 21st. Those are the final hearings dates of the trial
of the main action of the McCanns against Gonçalo Amaral. [ref. The
McCann couple demand 1,2 million euro from Gonçalo Amaral] It's
important for them to keep the story in the spotlight. These are news
without any real interest, like rehashing again the 195 leads, it's
just pure stupidity, pure media junk to keep the story in the
spotlight long enough to reuse it later on in terms of image [i.e. PR
strategy]. This is what is happening, it's better that the Portuguese
realize that, and by the way, the English people as well. This is
what is taking place, nothing else.
JP : What's written there [points to the UK newspaper being shown on the
TV/ref. 'Yard chief suggests Madeleine probe may be wound down'] in
the title...
PS : The "Scotland Yard" usage is to give the impression of an
argument from authority.
FMF : And respectability.
PS : And respectability. Exactly.
FMF : At least it's more respectable than the English government [ref. UK
PM's ex-media boss, friend to face charges for hacking].
PS : That's true. Do you remember about two months ago when David Cameron
forgot his daughter in the pub?
FMF : Exactly.
PS : This seems to be recurrent in the English. So, people should use some
discernment and understand that this is nothing more than a media
strategy to put the focus back in the McCann couple, in this case
targeting Portugal. What they want now [with the upcoming trial] is
to build up their image.
JP : So, it has to do with a specific agenda.
PS : Without any doubts.
FMF : There is an essential error that the Scotland Yard could present -
something that I've always considered a serious mistake in the
process, and I don't mind giving this contribution to the Scotland
Yard: What was the reason behind the protection given to the McCann
couple and friends by the Portuguese Judiciary Police, immediately at
the beginning? Why were they shielded? Why was there concern in
addressing them before the situation that was taking place? [ref.
Kate McCann forces political pressure] I know that some colleagues of
yours, journalists, hold a 'beatified vision' [i.e. a quasi
veneration] - "Oh, those poor parents", "Oh, those
poor friends", "They are all good people, drinking red wine
glasses and had nothing to do whatsoever with the child that was
sleeping 200 meters away", "Those wicked cops!" - that
is a sanctimonious and moralistic view that has nothing to do with
the police procedures when handling problems of violence and
homicide, where everyone is treated equally. And where the first
suspects are the ones closest to the victim.
JP : Only yesterday we spoke about that Spanish case [ref. Unexpected
twist in mystery over missing Spanish children], where a former
colleague of yours said that at the beginning they always have that
feeling of not involving the parents, and then...
FMF : But there isn't any other way, the victims, particularly children,
and also other victims, are generally produced by those who are
closest to them. This doesn't mean that the parents are guilty, it
could be by those who had access to the house. And then it also
emerged, another mistake that was made and that... - actually,
firstly, let me place these questions [still regarding the political
pressures]: Why? Where there any phone calls insisting that the
parents shouldn't be disturbed? Where there any superior authorities
that said "don't touch those people"? And the Portuguese
Judiciary Police should tell the truth, they should tell the truth.
Where there calls from the embassies? Where there phone calls
directly from the directorships of the Judiciary Police?....
PS : Ambassadors where there immediately.
FMF : Ambassadors where in there. [ref. McCann Case: Freedom of Information
Act on John Buck former Ambassador] Where there calls from the
English government? They should answer these questions. They know
what the answers are. It's not worth it to be silent.
JP : For the sake of clarity.